To you yes, to you ... no.
Before I criticize denuevo want to thank everyone I have read and liked, and also to those who have hated. Thanks to the feedback given to me haha. My sincerest thanks.
there anything I'm given and really do not find much sense.
NOTE: I want to clarify that when I say "values" more than anything else I refer to is called "principles" values \u200b\u200bof the things that lead one way or another act.
reigned for a long time the idea of \u200b\u200bnon-values, because if you have some kind of value are a retrograde, you are not free (it's funny, we really mean someone is or is not free and rarely think we carry in meaning of freedom). In other words, James Dean (Rebel without a cause) was the model, if you are "free" are the coolest.
Now there's something a little more reassured me today people valued being respected, in fact today is extremely common to hear "do not share, but I respect it." No?
yet there is something I have had to see and experience, is the fact that if your values \u200b\u200bhave some religious roots lose their value. Do not tell everyone to take it well, but it happens a lot. And it's strange, because when someone says " I do not do it for A, B, C grounds "you say the phrase I mentioned before, but if you add to that a religious attack mercilessly without very possibility of dialogue and discussion (which particularly hurts me.) Why? WHY? Where is the respect? Why do people of religion does not deserve?
not understand.
0 comments:
Post a Comment