was beginning an entry with an erudite vocabulary, perhaps far away. not enough to end a line and delete everything. denuevo start now. ----------------------
The other day I was studying, reading another text for my philosophy class, a text of Ortega y Gasset ("What is philosophy?) and then hit a theme preocuoa me that much and the fact is if we know anything .
my question is how can we know if we can do, the text goes "[...] is said that the man to get to know, the only thing that is a fact painfully striving to know "
point is that one somehow senses that "there is something you do not know and that makes us uneasy. but how can we know we do not know something? if you really do not know something we could not know, precisely because it is something we do not.
"Why man hurts his ignorance, as it could hurt a member who never had?"
up there have not said anything new, it is almost throughout the text. (I go now)
the thing that brought me urgently to write is a conclusion that this extragear. man has limits, otherwise we would not be men, we would be limitless beings would be God. so that we can not know some (maybe millions) of things we can not know what "icon in order" can not think the unthinkable, that it is what should drive our curiosity, we should not impose limits can not say "the power of knowledge (or anything else) the man comes up to here "no! we can not, because we know our limits because we can not know what we know.
So my point is we move on, no limit ourselves and that we ignore completely our limits, the best that we can continue to try to know, or what comes to mind. In March! ---------------
hopefully this has not been hateful (porsiacaso know it's a bit circular, but I'd rather see it as a resource, as suggested by Ortega y Gasset, attacking things spiral manner, reaching out a little, although I admit that my inexperience in these areas affects the quality of the final text hahahaha)
Thanks for reading!
0 comments:
Post a Comment