Quotes By Ash Ketchum

"Each area of \u200b\u200bknowledge is becoming increasingly less accessible to the uninitiated, and even each of them seems to be divided into sub-areas in a continuous process framentacón "Arthur Fisher


With this quotation from one of Fisher's books I want to start this new post. The Fisher grounds for today is very evident in my opinion, is something to look at the amount of post titles today universities offer these days, each day is a specialty, a sub-area of \u200b\u200bsubject knowledge. as anecdote I remember in my first year of psychology at UFRO a teacher told us "a specialist is someone who knows more and more about less and less "(no idea if she thought or took it from somewhere).

The thing is that today this fragamentación raises a million new terms that make that communication between areas is becoming increasingly complicated. (idea also found in fisher)

CP Snow talks on a novel about two cultures: science and the world of arts and letters.
I should clarify that there is some confusion here, some people argued that the second culture is the common people do not understand science.

Snow said that should arise a third culture that unites the two. So far that has not been given, but the author John Brockman notes that "although it came in any case a third culture: it is one established by scientists who came to communicate directly with the public" (from the same fisher chapter).
Basically it is these scientists who have left the world and people want to explain things in words they can understand, not to the intellectual air resbuscadas words that many use when they "explain" something (I put the "" because I assume that instead of explaining many want to flaunt your knowledge). Personally I charge these people, to find not polite to speak in technical terms, the trouble is that abounds that kind of attitude in students, and do not say that people are well, they are "ample" or "believed" in themselves but we all give that kind of "attacks."
in my opinion, we should go out and tell the world what we know. Let us not be fools, we can talk and explain things in normal words, it may take longer, but you can not let loose and poorly educated.

A blog dedicated to this in the third culture is this: http://terceracultura.cl/about/
(great name haha). They inspired me a bit to think about this. on that link may see a little more explained the issue.

I leave you alone with this entry for now ... now that I have finished porfin, I have listed the prelude to the real topic of this address queiro.
Thanks for reading!

Bonus track:

Video podcast of the presentation of the third culture


------------------------ PS: when
PD2 name comment leave any content that has any value judgments (ie good, bad) or some appreciation (I think society ...) is my responsibility and responds to MI OPINION.por therefore do not claim to be true (so do not ask me to "test")

Reno 911 Costumes Blue

Connecting News.

ago few days I found this: "If aliens ever visit us, I think the result would be very similar to what happened when Christopher Columbus first arrived in America, which was not very good for the natives," said the scientist [Hawking] The Times the weekend.
(via Fayerwayer) http://www.fayerwayer.com/

Today I saw this ... "They choose to Chile to install the largest telescope in the world"

http://www.latercera.com/contenido/
739_254531_9.shtml
But the thing that worries me is that I read today in EMOL:
"Purpose of telescope that will host Chile's search for life on other planets."

Conclusion: Chile being the bait. hahaha.

What Does The Pokeball With A 2 On A Card Mean

Ken Wilber: science and spirituality

planteamentos Wilber's very interesting. I really loved it. I share this video;).

Congratulation For Marriage In Japanese

To you yes, to you ... no.

Before I criticize denuevo want to thank everyone I have read and liked, and also to those who have hated. Thanks to the feedback given to me haha. My sincerest thanks.
there anything I'm given and really do not find much sense.

NOTE: I want to clarify that when I say "values" more than anything else I refer to is called "principles" values \u200b\u200bof the things that lead one way or another act.

reigned for a long time the idea of \u200b\u200bnon-values, because if you have some kind of value are a retrograde, you are not free (it's funny, we really mean someone is or is not free and rarely think we carry in meaning of freedom). In other words, James Dean (Rebel without a cause) was the model, if you are "free" are the coolest.

Now there's something a little more reassured me today people valued being respected, in fact today is extremely common to hear "do not share, but I respect it." No?
yet there is something I have had to see and experience, is the fact that if your values \u200b\u200bhave some religious roots lose their value. Do not tell everyone to take it well, but it happens a lot. And it's strange, because when someone says " I do not do it for A, B, C grounds "you say the phrase I mentioned before, but if you add to that a religious attack mercilessly without very possibility of dialogue and discussion (which particularly hurts me.) Why? WHY? Where is the respect? Why do people of religion does not deserve?

not understand.

School Halloween Carnival Ideas

I have a question: Is

essentially invisible to the eye?

my question is why this phrase has been so successful? Does anyone really think what this phrase means?

1-For me, my personal meeting with you is most important, and I see you, and because I can see, feel and be with you is because you are important to me.

2 - is essentially invisible to the eye? Or is it it's all invisible to the eye? Let's think well, I think we have no guarantee that we perceive objects of life as such and completely through our senses. in fact matters little to us what things really are, I believe it is in our head is basically the combination between the concept of that object to us, what we feel for the object and what we do with the object. at the bottom and not the object but what we see "our own purpose."

I can say, yes, but there must be an object so that we can form an image.
and I say: yes, I do not deny, you're absolutely right, but that's not my point.

my point is that sometimes deified certain things, you create those cliché phrases that are but nobody sees them as such because they are too wise to put them into question. we see only the value that is romantic-wise, and instead of contributing to the improvement, mannose sometimes without even knowing the true extent of this claim, making it not able to apply it to everyday life.

And that is my question.
what do you say?

Anarkali Churidar Stitchingtutorial

I have a question, "Are you Christian?"

Seldom in my life I have wondered if "I am a believer" so very few times I had noticed that phrase and what it might mean.

"believer." What the hell is that? first of all is a totally ambiguous phrase
"Yes, believe very much in holders used to eat noodles"
but well, as there is some consensus about what the question means it is generally understood and my newly dimension becomes "stupid."

else I see in the term "believer" is a concept that may be religious people have a passive concept, it's like to be "Christian" meant only to pray and contemplate God without doing anything else, as if believe is all that is done in a religion (regardless which one). I do not believe me away so much of what you think about reality.

other hand we have the "activists," I believe people have a conception of "rowdy" people doing many things. to my mind, maybe people doing so many things that sometimes loses the north and becomes a make do and become a bodybuilding to do things (to see who gets bigger and better things, "ganémosle to the ceiling "" move to the INJUV "). (note I said SOMETIMES). It's okay to do things, but sometimes it takes a sense beyond the "cool" that is so fleeting in some cases, a "somewhat" important, perhaps, that drives us, an ideal background. But the latter is more my own, my opinion.

then if you ask me "are you a believer?" my answer is: No, I do not want to be, nor I want to be a mere activist (read: negative definition so I gave a moment ago), I'm just a Catholic who wants to do its hits as such, I do not want to enclose the entire day in church, nor do I want to do things for them without a background that drives me forward each day.

Church Banquet Programs

not know until they arrive.

was beginning an entry with an erudite vocabulary, perhaps far away. not enough to end a line and delete everything. denuevo start now. ----------------------

The other day I was studying, reading another text for my philosophy class, a text of Ortega y Gasset ("What is philosophy?) and then hit a theme preocuoa me that much and the fact is if we know anything .
my question is how can we know if we can do, the text goes "[...] is said that the man to get to know, the only thing that is a fact painfully striving to know "

point is that one somehow senses that "there is something you do not know and that makes us uneasy. but how can we know we do not know something? if you really do not know something we could not know, precisely because it is something we do not.
"Why man hurts his ignorance, as it could hurt a member who never had?"

up there have not said anything new, it is almost throughout the text. (I go now)

the thing that brought me urgently to write is a conclusion that this extragear. man has limits, otherwise we would not be men, we would be limitless beings would be God. so that we can not know some (maybe millions) of things we can not know what "icon in order" can not think the unthinkable, that it is what should drive our curiosity, we should not impose limits can not say "the power of knowledge (or anything else) the man comes up to here "no! we can not, because we know our limits because we can not know what we know.

So my point is we move on, no limit ourselves and that we ignore completely our limits, the best that we can continue to try to know, or what comes to mind. In March! ---------------


hopefully this has not been hateful (porsiacaso know it's a bit circular, but I'd rather see it as a resource, as suggested by Ortega y Gasset, attacking things spiral manner, reaching out a little, although I admit that my inexperience in these areas affects the quality of the final text hahahaha)
Thanks for reading!

Third Party Decrypting Software

Is time to Take the Time

now I will write.

not think much hahaha. Now I wanted to write and that's what I'm doing. Had already left a long time this dropped.
"I do not really arrived ideas? right now I think that really was me that came out to meet the ideas, I did not think time.
this time I must thank the people who indirectly encouraged me to give me time to write, some bloggers like Alvaro Almond (Every Step Leave http://bit.ly/92jWgO Footprint) and my professor of philosophy course in college .

One of the things that is encouraging me to write without even needing to have something concrete to say, something that changes the lives of my readers or some relief. sometimes we can just write, not that what we write is empty, because it gives me the impression that the content works best when we write freely and that the issue will naturally give (perhaps messy sometimes, but natural), often texts filled with "content" are to my empty and full of vanity (as much poetry for me is one of the clearest examples, but not only). I feel that we must detach from the need to " produce" something, and that something serve , man's own thoughts modern that emerged in the era of industrial revolution and continues today.

Another important thing I've been encouraged lately is giving me time. In a text called "Times and Setbacks of thinking" I read to mention philosophy Wittgenstein's words:
"the philosophers greeting each other should be: <>
I would like to extend this greeting to all, should give us time. Today
lot measure their worth in terms of productivity (and back again to the theme of modernity), so the time is measured in how much you can produce, how much you do in 5 minutes, how many things you can do to time. Derrepente could give us time to think, to write, to take off, etc. Perhaps we realize many things we may not realize anything, yet I doubt that as long as we do not realize anything is fruitless, the text I quoted previously compared the act of thinking and ask to agriculture: The questions are like seeds to water and care that we eventually will bear fruit one day.

One last remark that is the time to think, sometimes we have to give us time to get rid of certain strings, beware of the vices, a very personal example is the computer, something that binds me: I am full of information I am looking forward get me full of fun and occupations at the same time, things that are helpful if we think it's good to be an informed person is distracted good games and is good to be busy and doing what we do, however run the hazard pass important things for us no time to think, to ask what happens to me with this I get? What consequences has this information? what about this happening to me?. Are we going to let what happens to us as if nothing or are we going to give us time to think deeply is going on with our lives?.

Greetings and thanks to all who read this (if someone does haha)