After two world wars and after the camps de exterminio en donde fueron suprimidos millones de hombres inocentes no es posible mirar el progreso científico y técnico con la misma ingenua superficialidad que era característica del siglo pasado. Joseph Gevaert
After an earthquake, after the number of people killed by natural disasters still think it is sufficient to also stop being so cocky as to believe that science is the solution to everything.
I am not against science or anything, in fact I have a strong desire to work in scientific research when they leave (maybe something with linguistics or something like that), but I am concerned at the excessive confiansa science and her pretense that we will find the solution to all our problems.
I think maybe we should look a little more critical eye to science, not so captivated by his ability and everything seems good that we face, but also try to see a little more.
is not my intention to promote science suspicion that people type Salfate origin who sees conspiracies everywhere, rather I would like to promote the vision of the child (many underestimate but have much to teach), this curious view question so much and that is not satisfied with the answers "and why?" and why? ". Above all try to get rid of the binary value judgments [the hardest thing in the world, I must admit] good guy / bad, efficient / inefficient, and try to see things the full extent possible and then if you want you can discuss value judgments.
certainly see things as possible can not do one, and discuss the good and bad thing either, I think I need conversation and discussion of issues within communities, groups of friends, etc. but that is another issue.
Thanks to those who have read me, which they liked and did not. Thanks for the and 600 visits, I hope not decline.
As always expect some feedback. Greetings to everyone.
0 comments:
Post a Comment